For more flexibility in the future it would be good to modify VisualRandomTestGen to use Pydgin simulators: https://github.com/cornell-brg/pydgin.
That would make it easier to test arbitrary instruction sets.
I suppose also a more long-term project would be to re-implement Pydgin simulators directly in Visual2 so that Pydgin definitions could directly generate instruction parse and simulation.
For more flexibility in the future it would be good to modify VisualRandomTestGen to use Pydgin simulators: https://github.com/cornell-brg/pydgin.
That would make it easier to test arbitrary instruction sets.
I suppose also a more long-term project would be to re-implement Pydgin simulators directly in Visual2 so that Pydgin definitions could directly generate instruction parse and simulation.