-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy path! TERA Header
More file actions
231 lines (163 loc) · 4.22 KB
/
Copy path! TERA Header
File metadata and controls
231 lines (163 loc) · 4.22 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
## Main Formula
TERA evaluates whether an informational state is stable enough for commitment by combining:
1. **anchored readability**
2. **geodesic logical cost**
3. **gate-based decision logic**
### 1. Perspective Anchor
Let
\[
a \in \mathbb{R}^n
\]
be the anchor (reference state), and let
\[
x \in \mathbb{R}^n
\]
be the current state.
The anchored reading is
\[
r_a(x) = x - a
\]
This is the first condition of legibility:
without an anchor, there is only position;
with an anchor, there is direction, distance, and relational meaning.
---
### 2. Main TERA Functional
Let
- \(M\) be a state space,
- \(x_0\) the current anchored state,
- \(x_g\) the goal state,
- \(\gamma : [0,1] \to M\) a candidate trajectory.
Define the TERA cost functional as
\[
J[\gamma \mid a]
=
\int_0^1
\left(
\|\dot\gamma(t)\|_{G(\gamma(t))}^2
+
\alpha A(\gamma(t))
+
\beta R(\gamma(t))
-
\mu K_a(\gamma(t),x_g)
\right)\,dt
\]
where
- \(G(x)\) is the local geometry / movement cost,
- \(A(x)\) is artifact load,
- \(R(x)\) is residual noise,
- \(K_a(x,x_g)\) is goal coherence measured relative to the anchor \(a\),
- \(\alpha,\beta,\mu \ge 0\) are weighting parameters.
### Interpretation
TERA minimizes:
- traversal cost,
- artifact exposure,
- residual noise,
while maximizing:
- anchor-aligned goal coherence.
This means TERA does not ask for the naive shortest path.
It asks for the most coherent low-distortion trajectory relative to a readable reference.
---
### 3. Informational Tension Score
For a current informational state \(b_n\), define a tension score
\[
s_n
=
\lambda_1 I(b_n)
+
\lambda_2 \Delta I_n
+
\lambda_3 J^\*_n
\]
with
\[
J^\*_n = \min_{\gamma} J[\gamma \mid a]
\]
where
- \(I(b_n)\) is informational stress / uncertainty,
- \(\Delta I_n\) is informational drift,
- \(J^\*_n\) is the minimal anchored logical path cost.
This gives one combined quantity describing whether the current state is readable, stable, and decision-worthy.
---
### 4. Gate Logic
The TERA gate is defined by thresholds:
\[
\mathrm{Gate}(b_n)=
\begin{cases}
\mathrm{ACCEPT}, & s_n \le \tau_{\mathrm{acc}} \;\land\; \mathrm{Rob}_\Gamma(b_n)\ge \eta \\
\mathrm{WAIT}, & \tau_{\mathrm{acc}} < s_n < \tau_{\mathrm{rej}} \\
\mathrm{REJECT}, & s_n \ge \tau_{\mathrm{rej}} \;\lor\; \mathrm{Rob}_\Gamma(b_n)<\eta
\end{cases}
\]
where
- \(\tau_{\mathrm{acc}}\) is the acceptance threshold,
- \(\tau_{\mathrm{rej}}\) is the rejection threshold,
- \(\mathrm{Rob}_\Gamma(b_n)\) is robustness under admissible context variation \(\Gamma\),
- \(\eta\) is the minimum admissible robustness level.
---
### 5. One-Line Reading
TERA decides by asking whether an anchored informational state remains coherent enough, under drift, artifact load, residual noise, and context variation, to justify commitment.
---
### 6. Compact Summary
\[
\boxed{
\text{Anchor} \to \text{Readable State} \to \text{Logical Cost} \to \text{Tension} \to \text{Gate}
}
\]
or more explicitly:
\[
\boxed{
r_a(x)=x-a
\;\to\;
J[\gamma \mid a]
\;\to\;
s_n
\;\to\;
## Main Formula
TERA evaluates whether a current state is stable enough for commitment by combining:
1. anchored readability
2. logical path cost
3. informational drift
4. gate-based decision logic
Let \(a\) be the anchor, \(x_n\) the current state, and \(x_g\) the goal state.
### 1. Anchored Reading
\[
r_a(x_n) = x_n - a
\]
### 2. Minimal Logical Cost
\[
J_n^\* = \min_{\gamma : x_n \to x_g} J[\gamma \mid a]
\]
### 3. Normalized Tension Score
\[
\hat s_n
=
\lambda_1 \hat I(x_n)
+
\lambda_2 \widehat{\Delta I}_n
+
\lambda_3 \hat J_n^\*
\]
where all terms are normalized to a comparable scale.
### 4. Gate
\[
\mathrm{Gate}(x_n)=
\begin{cases}
\mathrm{ACCEPT}, & \hat s_n \le \tau_{\mathrm{acc}} \land \mathrm{Rob}_\Gamma(x_n)\ge \eta \\
\mathrm{WAIT}, & \tau_{\mathrm{acc}} < \hat s_n < \tau_{\mathrm{rej}} \\
\mathrm{REJECT}, & \hat s_n \ge \tau_{\mathrm{rej}} \lor \mathrm{Rob}_\Gamma(x_n)<\eta
\end{cases}
\]
\{\mathrm{ACCEPT},\mathrm{WAIT},\mathrm{REJECT}\}
}
\]
This is the minimal TERA chain:
from reference,
to structure,
to stability,
to decision.
\boxed{
\hat s_n = \lambda_1 \hat I_n + \lambda_2 \widehat{\Delta I}_n + \lambda_3 \hat J_n^\*
\quad\Longrightarrow\quad
\mathrm{Gate}(x_n)\in\{\mathrm{ACCEPT},\mathrm{WAIT},\mathrm{REJECT}\}
}