Just opened bundlephobia, glamor-jss scores at https://bundlephobia.com/result?p=glamor-jss@1.4.1 20.3KB while
JSS https://bundlephobia.com/result?p=jss@9.8.7 scores 6.9KB
and the preset https://bundlephobia.com/result?p=jss-preset-default@4.5.0 5.3 KB
JSS + preset = 12 KB
I think glamor-jss has high potential to become smaller if relevant parts are reduced. Also it might be smaller if tree shaking is applied, but that would require all dependencies in esm.
Just opened bundlephobia, glamor-jss scores at https://bundlephobia.com/result?p=glamor-jss@1.4.1 20.3KB while
JSS https://bundlephobia.com/result?p=jss@9.8.7 scores 6.9KB
and the preset https://bundlephobia.com/result?p=jss-preset-default@4.5.0 5.3 KB
JSS + preset = 12 KB
I think glamor-jss has high potential to become smaller if relevant parts are reduced. Also it might be smaller if tree shaking is applied, but that would require all dependencies in esm.