Hello!
I have a function at 0x1802b4d40 in this Windows PE x64 file
sample.txt (ignore extension its a dll, github wouldnt upload otherwise)
text:00000001802B4D40 000 mov [rsp-8+arg_0], rbx
.text:00000001802B4D45 000 push rbp
.text:00000001802B4D46 008 push rsi
.text:00000001802B4D47 010 push rdi
.text:00000001802B4D48 018 push r12
.text:00000001802B4D4A 020 push r13
.text:00000001802B4D4C 028 push r14
.text:00000001802B4D4E 030 push r15
.text:00000001802B4D50 038 lea rbp, [rsp-0F00h]
.text:00000001802B4D58 038 mov eax, 1000h
.text:00000001802B4D5D 038 call __alloca_probe
.text:00000001802B4D62 1038 sub rsp, rax
.text:00000001802B4D65 1038 mov rdi, r8
.text:00000001802B4D68 1038 mov r14, rdx
.text:00000001802B4D6B 1038 mov r15, rcx
.text:00000001802B4D6E 1038 xor esi, esi
It seems like alloca_probe is messing with the stack size calculations, I also have another function where it did this, it specially happens on functions with large stacks. Do you have a clue how to fix it? I tried but couldnt figure it out. There is many stack strings in those functions, they seem to be constructed in part with XMM registers, though some smaller functions that did the same thing ironstrings was able to find strings without an issue. I tried other tools as well like flare-floss, stackstrings, nothing worked. ironstrings is what found the most strings in this sample, but still missing quite a few.
Here's the program output:
ironstrings2.log
Thanks a lot!
Hello!
I have a function at 0x1802b4d40 in this Windows PE x64 file
sample.txt (ignore extension its a dll, github wouldnt upload otherwise)
It seems like alloca_probe is messing with the stack size calculations, I also have another function where it did this, it specially happens on functions with large stacks. Do you have a clue how to fix it? I tried but couldnt figure it out. There is many stack strings in those functions, they seem to be constructed in part with XMM registers, though some smaller functions that did the same thing ironstrings was able to find strings without an issue. I tried other tools as well like flare-floss, stackstrings, nothing worked. ironstrings is what found the most strings in this sample, but still missing quite a few.
Here's the program output:
ironstrings2.log
Thanks a lot!