Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi @aayrolles, Thanks for your message! It would absolutely make sense to use pediatric/adolescent water relaxation values from this paper. Indeed, I also wouldn't extrapolate the linear trends from our 20-60 relaxation atlas into younger age. One interesting thing you could do is look whether the predictions from the two papers approximately agree at an age of around 20. I currently don't have the bandwidth to implement this, but you should be able to do it relatively easily by modifying If you make it this far, I'd appreciate a pull request so we can merge it into OspreyQuantify (obviously with attribution). Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello all,
I am working with pediatric MRS data (children / early adolescents, e.g. ~8–15 years). I understand that the current RelaxationAtlas implementation is based on linear models derived from an adult cohort (20–60 years)
I would like to ask for your opinion on whether it would make sense (methodologically) to use pediatric water relaxation values from Lee et al., 2018 (NMR in Biomedicine, DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000435) within Osprey for younger subjects, instead of extrapolating the adult-based atlas to ages below the training range.
More specifically:
Do you see any major conceptual or technical issues with overriding the default water T1/T2 (and proton density) values in Osprey using pediatric literature values (e.g. Lee 2018) for children/adolescents?
Would you consider this preferable to extrapolating the adult RelaxationAtlas to pediatric ages?
Is there a other recommended way within Osprey to work with pediatric MRI?
I am not expecting Osprey to natively support Lee 2018, but I would appreciate your guidance on best practice from a methodological standpoint.
Thank you very much for your time and for making Osprey openly available :)
Anaël Ayrolles
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions