[dash] Add Privatelink traffic test#14757
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Prabhat Aravind <paravind@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
|
@mukeshmv to review |
|
|
||
| @pytest.fixture(scope="module") | ||
| def dpu_ip(duthost, dpu_index): | ||
| cmd = f"ip addr show | grep Ethernet-BP{dpu_index} | grep inet | awk '{{print $2}}'" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The interface is vendor-specific. It should be taken from platform.json file: https://github.com/sonic-net/SONiC/blob/master/doc/smart-switch/pmon/smartswitch-pmon.md#313-npu-to-dpu-data-port-mapping
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here is an example of Nvidia platform:
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#20358
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
JibinBao
left a comment
JibinBao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have a test plan to explain the test? espeicallly for the privatelink_config,
What do the variables defined in the file of privatelink_config.py mean? If there is a chart to introduce the different ips in the test, it will be better.
Thanks
|
@theasianpianist the test misses the data plane interface configuration for both the NPU and DPU sides. There is a static route that the test adds on the NPU side to send traffic to the DPU, but no IP address configuration on the interfaces. Therefore, the test won’t work without some manual pre-configuration. My assumption is that the test should be atomic and apply the full configuration needed to pass. The test should be extended to set the IP address on the NPU, and the IP address and VIP address on the DPU. |
| logger.info(messages) | ||
| apply_messages(localhost, duthost, ptfhost, messages, dpu_index) | ||
|
|
||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is no clean up of the dash configurations.
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run Azure.sonic-mgmt |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
| dash_info[LOCAL_PTF_INTF] = minigraph_facts["minigraph_ptf_indices"][intf] | ||
| dash_info[LOCAL_PTF_MAC] = neigh_table["v4"][neigh_ip]["macaddress"] | ||
| if topo == 'dpu-1' and REMOTE_PA_IP not in dash_info: | ||
| if (topo == 'dpu-1' or topo == "t1-28-lag") and REMOTE_PA_IP not in dash_info: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We'll need to add smartswitch-t1 topo as well here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We'll do this later. Ok to merge for now.
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@oleksandrivantsiv , can you signoff? |
|
depends on sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21553 |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
Also depends on sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21714 |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run |
|
Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 14757 in repo sonic-net/sonic-mgmt |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Signed-off-by: Lawrence Lee <lawlee@microsoft.com>
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
| self.gnmi_client_key = "gnmiclient.key" | ||
| self.gnmi_server_start_wait_time = 30 | ||
| self.enable_zmq = duthost.shell("netstat -na | grep -w 8100", module_ignore_errors=True)['rc'] == 0 | ||
| # self.enable_zmq = duthost.shell("netstat -na | grep -w 8100", module_ignore_errors=True)['rc'] == 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@theasianpianist , why change dash test case always enable ZMQ on GNMI?
If someone run these test case on a device not enable ZMQ on orchagent side, some test case may failed, can you check this change?
|
Hi @theasianpianist |
12 participants
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes #14613
Adds outbound and inbound traffic tests for Privatelink
Type of change
Back port request
PR testes are failing, dependent on sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21553
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
Add test cases to cover Privatelink traffic scenarios
How did you do it?
How did you verify/test it?
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Smartswitch testbed only
Documentation