Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
55 lines (38 loc) · 1.93 KB

File metadata and controls

55 lines (38 loc) · 1.93 KB

TO-DO: Cheap DUTs to compare DIY BNC calibration vs SMA calibration kit

Goal: check whether the DIY BNC calibration kit gives practical amateur-level results close to a reference SMA calibration kit.

Test rules

  • Use the same NanoVNA, sweep range, number of points, adapters, and settings
  • Save screenshots for both calibrations
  • Compare both traces and marker values
  • Repeat each DUT connection at least 3 times

DUTs to test

  • Independent 50 ohm load
    Check whether both calibrations show a similar match, return loss, and impedance

  • Fixed attenuator (3 dB / 6 dB / 10 dB)
    Check S21 attenuation and overall flatness

  • Short coax cable
    Measure with open and short at the far end, then compare Smith chart behavior

  • BNC barrel / SMA-BNC adapter / through adapter
    Check insertion loss and mismatch

  • Simple resistive DUTs (33 ohm / 75 ohm / 100 ohm)
    Check whether the measured mismatch and impedance make sense

  • Cheap LC or SAW filter
    Compare passband, stopband, and general trace shape

  • Optional real-world DUT
    Small antenna, matching network, or radio dummy load

Suggested test order

  • 50 ohm load
  • Fixed attenuator
  • Short coax cable
  • Adapters / barrel
  • 33 ohm / 75 ohm / 100 ohm loads
  • Filter
  • Optional antenna-related DUT

Practical pass/fail criteria

  • PASS: results are close to the SMA calibration kit across the intended frequency range

  • PASS: repeated connections give similar results

  • PASS: loads, attenuators, cables, and filters behave as expected

  • WARNING: noticeable differences appear only near the upper frequency limit

  • FAIL: results change too much after reconnecting the DUT

  • FAIL: DUT behavior looks clearly wrong compared to the SMA calibration kit

  • FAIL: the DIY kit only looks good when measuring its own standards