Skip to content

test: add failing test for real fluent not shown in problem kind#734

Draft
arbimo wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/undetected-real-fluent
Draft

test: add failing test for real fluent not shown in problem kind#734
arbimo wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/undetected-real-fluent

Conversation

@arbimo

@arbimo arbimo commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@alvalentini @Framba-Luca This is more of a bug report than a complete pull request, but fixing it would certainly benefit from your expertise on this part of the library =)

In essence there is one problem in our test suite ("robot_with_variable_duration") that has a real fluent but for which the corresponding feature is not detected.
My intuition is that this happens because the fluent is not used in the problem itself.

This PR just adds a failing test for this.

@alvalentini

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The idea is that the feature REAL_FLUENTS indicate a "numeric" planning problem. So if we have real fluents only in the duration definitions, we have the features: STATIC_FLUENTS_IN_DURATIONS and REAL_TYPE_DURATIONS. Because we want to differentiate temporal planning problems that use real fluents only to define actions duration from temporal numeric planning problems that uses real fluents in the problem "body". Does this make sense for you @arbimo?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants