poe: add/update official provider model metadata#2930
Open
ChillMagic wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
ChillMagic
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
/v1/models.[cost].GPT-Image-1.5display name casing.Verification
pdfis declaredNotes
qwen3-next-80b-thinkrequiresenable_thinking = true, so it is set via provider body.[cost].base_model: Poe models can usebase_modelwhere there is a clean canonical model match and only small provider-specific differences. I kept these entries expanded because the pricing, modalities, PDF support, and reasoning controls are Poe-bot-specific and were verified against Poe's API/catalog rather than inherited from an upstream provider.