Skip to content

ci: Alert Slack on failure across CI workflows#1912

Open
vdusek wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
ci/slack-notify-on-failure
Open

ci: Alert Slack on failure across CI workflows#1912
vdusek wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
ci/slack-notify-on-failure

Conversation

@vdusek
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@vdusek vdusek commented May 25, 2026

Let's make "Notify Slack on failure" reusable, and reuse it across other places where it makes sense. Apply it to other Python repos once this is merged.

@vdusek vdusek requested a review from janbuchar May 25, 2026 08:15
@vdusek vdusek self-assigned this May 25, 2026
@vdusek vdusek added t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. labels May 25, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 141st sprint - Tooling team milestone May 25, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 25, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.90%. Comparing base (b13af58) to head (54d98d0).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1912      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.92%   92.90%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         167      167              
  Lines       11714    11714              
==========================================
- Hits        10885    10883       -2     
- Misses        829      831       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 92.90% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@janbuchar janbuchar May 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this really worth a Slack notification? If so, maybe we should just set up an org-level hook to monitor all failed workflow runs...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean just on_issue, right? And the rest is ok?

Agreed, it's not really needed there.

For the other workflows, I'd like to have them - mostly for myself, so I have a single place that notifies me about failing runs, instead of having to check each repo manually.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As long as it saves work, it's a good thing to have. But if you want to monitor more repositories than just this one, I still think that an organization-level webhook would be less intrusive 🙂

@vdusek vdusek requested a review from janbuchar May 25, 2026 17:26
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As long as it saves work, it's a good thing to have. But if you want to monitor more repositories than just this one, I still think that an organization-level webhook would be less intrusive 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants