BIP 54: progress to Complete

[darosior]

I have concluded all planned work on BIP 54. I believe it represents a net improvement and is ready for adoption by the Bitcoin community. As per BIP 3, this updates its status to Complete.

[murchandamus]

I had another look at test vectors and reference implementation. Concerns and issues have been discussed on the mailing list and are documented in the proposal. LGTM.

[jonatack]

ACK

[JeremyRubin]

process wise this seems like a fast merge

[murchandamus]

This PR was just a Metadata update and a link update for the reference implementation.
Updating a BIP to Complete is a determination made by the Authors to signal that they have finished their planned work.

Relevant section of BIP3:

When the authors have concluded all planned work on their proposal, are confident that their BIP represents a net improvement, is clear, comprehensive, and is ready for adoption by the Bitcoin community, they may update the BIP’s status to Complete to indicate that they recommend adoption, implementation, or deployment of the BIP. Where applicable, the authors must ensure that any proposed specification is solid, not unduly complicated, and definitive. Specification BIPs must come with or refer to a working reference implementation and comprehensive test vectors before they can be moved to Complete. Subsequently, the BIP’s content should only be adjusted in minor details, e.g., to improve language, clarify ambiguities, backfill omissions in the specification, add test vectors for edge cases, or address other issues discovered as the BIP is being adopted.

@JeremyRubin: By the way, I asked a couple days ago, whether you would agree that CTV should be Complete rather than Draft. I’m also waiting for your sign-off to publish OP_TWEAKADD.

[ajtowns]

I'm surprised a consensus change bip was advanced to complete while not including activation parameters. Is the idea that activation parameters would come under the "minimal and interfere as little as possible with ongoing adoption" clause of allowed modifications to a complete bip, or will activation params for bip54 go in a separate bip (similar to 448 vs 446/348/349?), or something else?